jayesh
@0xjayeshyadav
After this post, I received many suggestions to explore Solana’s DeFi, which could overtake Ethereum.
在这篇帖子发布后，我收到了很多建议，让我去探索那些可能超越以太坊的 Solana DeFi 生态。
My opinion: If your definition of “good DeFi” is high TPS and cheap fees, then yes, Solana wins.
我的观点是：如果你对“优质 DeFi”的定义是高 TPS（每秒交易量）和低廉的手续费，那么是的，Solana 赢了。
If it’s credible finance that survives adversarial conditions, Ethereum remains the king.
但如果定义是能够对抗极端恶劣环境、且值得信赖的金融体系，以太坊依然是王者。
> Reliability: Solana has had 7 major outages in 5 years, whereas Ethereum has had zero.
> 可靠性：Solana 在 5 年内发生了 7 次重大停机事故，而以太坊的记录为零。
>
> Consensus: Ethereum runs multiple validator clients, whereas Solana still relies on one main client, creating a single point of failure.
> 共识机制：以太坊运行着多个验证者客户端，而 Solana 仍依赖于一个主要客户端，这制造了单点故障风险。
>
> Developer Base: Ethereum’s dev community (8.9k active devs) is 3.6× larger than Solana’s.
> 开发者基础：以太坊的开发者社区（8900 名活跃开发者）规模是 Solana 的 3.6 倍。
>
> DeFi & Liquidity: Ethereum’s DeFi TVL ($77B) and stablecoin supply ($182B) dwarf Solana’s ($11B TVL, $15B stablecoins).
> DeFi 与流动性：以太坊的 DeFi 总锁仓量（770 亿美元）和稳定币供应量（1820 亿美元）让 Solana（110 亿 TVL，150 亿稳定币）显得微不足道。
>
Fact: Ethereum’s stability and liquidity are lightyears ahead.
事实：以太坊的稳定性和流动性领先了几个光年。